תוצאת חיפוש

The Current Compulsory Hospitalization Order and Patients' Rights

Y. Bar-el, R. Durst, J Mazar, J. Rabinowitz, Y. Lerner, H.Y. Knobler

Office of Jerusalem District Psychiatrist; Jerusalem Mental Health Center, Kfar Shaul Hospital; Mental Health Services, Israel Ministry of Health; School of Social Work, Bar-Ilan University; and Falk Institute for Mental Health and Behavioral Sciences, Kfar Shaul (Affiliated with the Hebrew University - Hadassah Medical School)

Israel's "Treatment of Mentally Sick Persons Law" of 1955 was repealed and replaced by the "Treatment of Mental Patients Law" of 1991. Under the latter, the "Compulsory Hospitalization Order" (CHO) defines the new order based on accumulated experience with the old legislation, and on the philosophy that considers the CHO one of the most severely oppressive forms of deprivation of human liberty and rights. The new order sets limits and boundaries for CHO, guarding the rights of those unavoidably committed by force. According to the new law, the district psychiatrist decides upon and issues the order, while the tribunal (District Psychiatric Committee) considers appeals. The order is limited to 1 week, with an option for the district psychiatrist to prolong it on written request for up to 14 days. The tribunal can later prolong the order further.

The objective of this study was to review changes that have occurred following enforcement of the new law in the Jerusalem district. A comparison was made between CHO's issued the year before the new legislation took effect and the year after. The comparison included review of all CHO's and medical files of all patients hospitalized by coercion during 1990 and 1992. It was assumed that there would be a decline in rate and length of hospitalization of patients forced to be committed by the new law.

The main findings refuted this hypothesis. In 1992 there was an increase of 38% in the number of compulsory hospitalizations. This increase derived mainly from increased demands for CHO's from psychiatric emergency rooms. There was also an increase in patients hospitalized by order of the District Psychiatric Committee using its authority under section 10(C) of the law.

Conversely, length of compulsory hospitalization was shorter under the new law.

In light of these findings, it would seem that the new law has only partially fulfilled expectations of reform in individual rights. There is need for further evaluation and follow-up of the CHO in order to determine whether the "Treatment of Mental Patients Law" of 1991 has in fact fulfilled its objectives. Furthermore, it is necessary to determine means, medical or legal, that may possibly advance further the prospective of human rights while maintaining a suitable balance between civil liberties and clinical needs, of over-confinement versus under-treatment, which may lead to neglect or danger.

Characteristics of Israeli Primary Health Care Physicians who Treat Depression

Jonathan Rabinowitz, Dina Feldman, Revital Gross, Wienka Boerma

Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan; Israel Ministry of Health; JDC-Brookdale Institute, Jerusalem; and Netherlands Institute of Primary Health Care (NIVEL)

Primary health care physicians have a pivotal role in treating mental health problems. We determined the proportion of primary care physicians in Israel who treat depression and their characteristics. The study was based on a stratified national random sample of primary care physicians (n677, response rate 78%). From these physicians' reports 22% always treat depression, 36.6% usually, 28.6% sometimes, and 12.6% never. Based on a logistic regression model the physicians who always or usually treated depression were distinguished from the other physicians by their treating more medical conditions on their own, seeing themselves as having more first contact for psychosocial problems, having frequent contact with social workers and specializing in family medicine. Primary health care physicians play a major role in treating depression on their own. This raises new questions about how they treat depression themselves, and under what circumstances they treat or refer to a specialist.

Characteristics of Adults with Emotional Distress, and Patterns of Mental Health Services Use

Revital Gross, Dina Feldman, Yonathan Rabinowitz, Miriam Greenstein, Ayelet Berg

Health Policy Research Unit, JDC-Brookdale Institute and Mental Health Division, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem and School of Social Work, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan

We sought firsthand data on the extent of perceived mental health needs and on patterns of use of mental health services among Israelis aged 22 and over. The data are from a national survey conducted in 1995. A random sample of phone numbers from the telephone company's computerized listings yielded 1,395 completed questionnaires (response rate, 81%).

At some point in their lives, 27% had experienced emotional distress or mental health problems with which they had difficulty coping alone; 13.4% reported that they had such an experience during 1995. According to multivariate analysis, those more likely to report mental health problems were women, those with a chronic disease, Russian immigrants, divorced or widowed adults, those with a low level of education, and members of the Clalit sick fund. 38% of those who had ever had emotional or mental health problems had asked for help. The proportion of those seeking help was high among respondents aged 35-55, Hebrew speakers (compared to speakers of Russian or Arabic), and city dwellers, and the rate was low among members of the Clalit sick fund. Of those who did seek help, 39% went to a psychologist or a psychiatrist, 25% to their family doctor, 19% to a family member or friend, 7% to a social worker or social service agency, 6% to other medical personnel, and 4% to a psychiatric hospital. 30% turned for assistance to the private sector and 70% to the public sector.

These findings have special significance in view of the impending reform of the mental health services. As mandated by the new National Health Insurance Law, mental health services are to be included in the basket of health services provided by the sick funds. The data can be of use in the management of sick funds and for physicians working in the community, as they prepare for this change. In addition, the data will be of aid to national policy makers in planning services suited to the needs of different population groups and to allocate resources more rationally.